AIROGS: Artificial Intelligence for RObust Glaucoma Screening Challenge

Motivation

  • Early detection of glaucoma can avoid visual impairment,  which could be facilitated through screening.
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase the cost-effectiveness of glaucoma screening, by reducing the need for manual labor.
  • AI approaches for glaucoma detection from color fundus photography (CFP) have been proposed and promising at-the-lab performances have been reported. However, large performance drops often occur when AI solutions are applied in real-world settings. Unexpected out-of-distribution data and bad quality images are major causes for this performance drop.

Aim

  • The development of solutions for glaucoma screening from CFP that are robust to real-world scenarios.

Scope

  • The participants will be provided with gradable images to develop a model for glaucoma screening. In the test set, there are ungradable images as well, encouraging the participants to develop methods that have robustness mechanisms that can detect out-of-distribution samples. The methods cannot be trained with ungradable images, since this type of data is not present in the train set and the use of external data is prohibited.
  • Evaluation is two-fold: glaucoma screening performance and robustness.

Prizes

🥇   1st place  3000 EUR in cash  AWS credits to the value of 5000 USD.
🥈 2nd place : 2000 EUR in cash + AWS credits to the value of 3000 USD.
🥉 3rd place : 1000 EUR in cash + AWS credits to the value of 2000 USD.

Important dates

  • 1st of December 2021: Release of training data, Preliminary Test Phase 1 opens including a Docker container example for algorithms supported by grand-challenge.org
  • 1st of February 2022: Preliminary Test Phase 2 opens
  • 8th of February 2022: Final test phase opens
  • 1st 3rd 4th of March 2022: Deadline submission test results (closing of all test phases) and manuscript (see guidelines here). Note: After the winners were announced, all phases did open again for post-challenge submissions and will stay open indefinitely!
  • 21st of March 2022: Declaration of the leaderboard
  • 28th/29th/30th/31st of March 2022: Presentations at ISBI 2022

Organizers

  • Coen de Vente (Quantitative Healthcare Analysis (QurAI) Group, Informatics Institute, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands; Diagnostic Image Analysis Group (DIAG), Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands)
  • Koenraad A. Vermeer (Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands)
  • Nicolas Jaccard (Project Orbis International Inc., New York, United States)
  • Bram van Ginneken (Diagnostic Image Analysis Group (DIAG), Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands)
  • Hans G. Lemij (Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands)
  • Clara I. Sá‎nchez (Quantitative Healthcare Analysis (QurAI) Group, Informatics Institute, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands)

Final leaderboard at ISBI 2022

#

Authors

First author affilation

Final score

PDF

Algorithm

Code

1st

He Wang et al.

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

🇨🇳

1.8

📄*

💾

 

2nd

Firas Khader et al.

RWTH Aachen University Hospital

🇩🇪🇨🇭

3

📄*

💾

 

2nd

Temirgali et al.

CMC Technologies

🇰🇿

3

📄

💾

 

4th

Tien-Dung Le

KBC

🇧🇪

6.5

📄

💾 

 

5th

Adrian Galdran et al.

Universitat Pompeu Fabra

🇪🇸🇦🇺

7

📄

💾

 

6th

Densen Puthussery et al.

Founding Minds Software

🇮🇳

7.3

📄

💾

 

7th

Zekang Yang et al.

Institute of Computing Technology

🇨🇳

7.8

📄

💾 

 

8th

Satoshi Kondo et al.

Muroran Institute of Technology

🇯🇵

8

📄

💾 

 

9th

Edward Wang et al.

University of Western Ontario

🇨🇦

8.8

📄

💾 

🧑‍💻

10th

Jónathan Heras et al.

University of La Rioja

🇪🇸

9

📄

💾

🧑💻

11th

Teresa Araújo et al.

Medical University of Vienna

🇦🇹

10.5

📄*

💾 

 

11th

Mustafa Arikan

University College London, London

🇬🇧

10.5

📄

💾 

 

13th

Yeong Chan Lee et al.

Samsung Medical Center

🇰🇷

11.3

📄

💾

 

13th

Abdul Qayyum et al.

Université de Bourgogne

🇫🇷🇪🇸🇦🇺

11.3

📄

💾

 

15th

Wei Tang et al.

University of Groningen

🇳🇱🇨🇳

14.5

📄

💾

 

*Also published in ISBI Challenge Proceedings: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/9854512/proceeding

AIROGS session at ISBI 2022

Challenge paper and how to cite

See the challenge summary paper here and how to cite the challenge.

This challenge is sponsored by AWS.