A follow-up challenge has started – visit JustRAIGS to participate.
The AIROGS challenge is again open for submissions indefinitely! The prizes have already been awarded, but new submissions will be shown on the leaderboards. To view the new maximum number of submissions per team, click the "Submit" button.You can read more about the outcomes of AIROGS in our IEEE TMI paper.
AIROGS: Artificial Intelligence for RObust Glaucoma Screening Challenge¶
Motivation¶
- Early detection of glaucoma can avoid visual impairment, which could be facilitated through screening.
- Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase the cost-effectiveness of glaucoma screening, by reducing the need for manual labor.
- AI approaches for glaucoma detection from color fundus photography (CFP) have been proposed and promising at-the-lab performances have been reported. However, large performance drops often occur when AI solutions are applied in real-world settings. Unexpected out-of-distribution data and bad quality images are major causes for this performance drop.
Aim¶
- The development of solutions for glaucoma screening from CFP that are robust to real-world scenarios.
Scope¶
- The participants will be provided with gradable images to develop a model for glaucoma screening. In the test set, there are ungradable images as well, encouraging the participants to develop methods that have robustness mechanisms that can detect out-of-distribution samples. The methods cannot be trained with ungradable images, since this type of data is not present in the train set and the use of external data is prohibited.
- Evaluation is two-fold: glaucoma screening performance and robustness.
Prizes¶
🥇 | 1st place | : | 3000 EUR in cash | + | AWS credits to the value of 5000 USD. |
🥈 | 2nd place | : | 2000 EUR in cash | + | AWS credits to the value of 3000 USD. |
🥉 | 3rd place | : | 1000 EUR in cash | + | AWS credits to the value of 2000 USD. |
Important dates¶
- 1st of December 2021: Release of training data, Preliminary Test Phase 1 opens including a Docker container example for algorithms supported by grand-challenge.org
- 1st of February 2022: Preliminary Test Phase 2 opens
- 8th of February 2022: Final test phase opens
1st3rd4th of March 2022: Deadline submission test results (closing of all test phases) and manuscript (see guidelines here). Note: After the winners were announced, all phases did open again for post-challenge submissions and will stay open indefinitely!- 21st of March 2022: Declaration of the leaderboard
- 28th/29th/30th/31st of March 2022: Presentations at ISBI 2022
Organizers¶
- Coen de Vente (Quantitative Healthcare Analysis (QurAI) Group, Informatics Institute, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands; Diagnostic Image Analysis Group (DIAG), Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands)
- Koenraad A. Vermeer (Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands)
- Nicolas Jaccard (Project Orbis International Inc., New York, United States)
- Bram van Ginneken (Diagnostic Image Analysis Group (DIAG), Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands)
- Hans G. Lemij (Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands)
- Clara I. Sánchez (Quantitative Healthcare Analysis (QurAI) Group, Informatics Institute, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands)
Final leaderboard at ISBI 2022¶
# |
Authors |
First author affilation |
Final score |
Algorithm |
Code |
||
1st |
He Wang et al. |
Peking Union Medical College Hospital |
🇨🇳 |
1.8 |
📄* |
|
|
2nd |
Firas Khader et al. |
RWTH Aachen University Hospital |
🇩🇪🇨🇭 |
3 |
📄* |
|
|
2nd |
Temirgali et al. |
CMC Technologies |
🇰🇿 |
3 |
|
||
4th |
Tien-Dung Le |
KBC |
🇧🇪 |
6.5 |
|
||
5th |
Adrian Galdran et al. |
Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
🇪🇸🇦🇺 |
7 |
|
||
6th |
Densen Puthussery et al. |
Founding Minds Software |
🇮🇳 |
7.3 |
|
||
7th |
Zekang Yang et al. |
Institute of Computing Technology |
🇨🇳 |
7.8 |
|
||
8th |
Satoshi Kondo et al. |
Muroran Institute of Technology |
🇯🇵 |
8 |
|
||
9th |
Edward Wang et al. |
University of Western Ontario |
🇨🇦 |
8.8 |
|||
10th |
Jónathan Heras et al. |
University of La Rioja |
🇪🇸 |
9 |
|||
11th |
Teresa Araújo et al. |
Medical University of Vienna |
🇦🇹 |
10.5 |
📄* |
|
|
11th |
Mustafa Arikan |
University College London, London |
🇬🇧 |
10.5 |
|
||
13th |
Yeong Chan Lee et al. |
Samsung Medical Center |
🇰🇷 |
11.3 |
|
||
13th |
Abdul Qayyum et al. |
Université de Bourgogne |
🇫🇷🇪🇸🇦🇺 |
11.3 |
|
||
15th |
Wei Tang et al. |
University of Groningen |
🇳🇱🇨🇳 |
14.5 |
|
*Also published in ISBI Challenge Proceedings: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/9854512/proceeding
AIROGS session at ISBI 2022¶
Challenge paper and how to cite¶
See the challenge summary paper here and how to cite the challenge.
This challenge is sponsored by AWS.